Main menu:

Site search

Categories

Archive

Regarding Laws and Habitat

I am in agreement that local trail users need to be educated in the fields of conservation, ecology, and environmental politics. But it is such a shame that developers can pay big bucks to bulldoze a place with such natural beauty and environmental value, leaving a sliver of it to be “protected”. Meanwhile, the people who have enjoyed this area for decades are made to look like criminals because they want to continue to enjoy it?!

It is my understanding that many of the trails that exist in the Flightline area, were there long before the designation of “nature preserve” was granted. This area has a long history of hands-off management by the property owners. This probably does not apply to the Skyline trail or Safety Center trail, (northern trail and southeastern trail respectively) but it does apply to many of the other trails in the area.

I have studied wildlife conservation and ecosystem management at a college level, and I believe that nature needs more space on this planet. I also believe that conscientious humans and nature can exist side-by-side.  I know that the laws and rules you mention in your letter are for the protection of animal and plant species that deserve protection. However, I still feel that referring to “illegal” trails and “illegal” trail builders insinuates mal-intent. This is not the image I wish to see propagated in the public eye.

Most trails that start out as unauthorized trails are just worn in, and not necessarily constructed. This type of unauthorized trail is usually the result of the trail users seeking a more interesting experience, more exciting terrain or even just a view. This can be completely avoided by good trail planning. A good contour trail will encourage adherence to the trail and require little if any maintenance.  Including interesting terrain in the initial trail plan will keep everyone happy.

I know that in your position and at your level, you and the CNLM deal with these types of legal issues all the time. I think that you understand how precious this little sliver of land is, and how the loss of access has affected so many in a detrimental way. I appreciate the knowledge and insight you share when you elucidate things that are unclear to me. Please continue to share your view of the best way to regain access to this area. Thank you.

Comments

Comment from stefan
Time: November 23, 2006, 7:15 am

That was very well written…thank you.

Comment from JOsh
Time: November 24, 2006, 5:18 pm

Amen brother! You took the words right out of Mother Earth’s mouth!

Comment from Ken
Time: November 26, 2006, 7:39 am

Welcome to the world of ever increasing pressures of land use. With all these people living here there are fewer and fewer space resources left.

It is so important to stay tuned to what you local municpality has in the development/land use pipeline so that your voice can be heard before decisions are made. In land use decisions like this you have be ahead of the decision, because otherwise you are fighting from the wrong side of it. It is unfortunate.

Maybe it is time to start lobbying your city/county to purchase more open space for mounting biking. Maybe it is too late? Probably, as the developer own most of so. cal’s politicians. Bill Horn being one of them.

Hopefully you will realize that you are in the position where it appears that you now have little rights to use the property and that you will offer to become partners with CNLM in hopes of getting some rights to use it. Good luck.

Comment from FatMan
Time: January 10, 2007, 4:54 pm

Nice :)


Write a comment